朗读者

华安基金：创业板50指数聚焦四大新质生产力赛道_我的网站

一 |     　　行情回顾及主要观点：　　上周A股市场整体呈现调整趋势：沪深300跌1.01%，中证500跌1.70%，中证1000跌2.16%，创业板50上周跌2.09%，科创50跌3.73%。交易面，A股市场日均成交额在2.17万亿左右，流动性回落。    By Wang Gaofei, Wu Xinru     (ECNS) -- Do sunflower seeds and dumplings pose a "threat" to U.S. national security?    The question may sound absurd, but the latest additions to the so-called Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) entity list have raised questions about the breadth of the U.S. trade restrictions on Chinese goods. 43 Chinese companies have been added to the list in a single day, bringing the total to 187. From advanced chips to food and everyday apparel, the overreaching "big stick" of U.S. sanctions has finally ripped away its own fig-leaf.    Is this move really driven by "human rights concerns" as the West claimed, or is it merely the result of political calculation by Washington's elites? What lies behind Washington's decision to escalate sanctions just one day after reaching a consensus?    Josef Gregory Mahoney, an American scholar and professor of Politics and International Relations at East China Normal University, was recently invited to join News Lounge of China News Network where he unpacked the real intentions of U.S. sanctions.        Sunflower seeds and dumplings land on the list: The absurdity and futility behind overreaching sanctions     "This move is logically indefensible," Mahoney stated bluntly, "These consumer goods firms have absolutely no connection to the so-called 'forced labor' allegations. Claims are entirely fabricated and lack any factual basis."     He argued that the U.S.' true intention is clear -- using groundless excuses to suppress China's competitive ordinary industries, disrupt the stability of China's industrial and supply chains, and protect the market share of its own traditional industries at the expense of Chinese enterprises' legitimate rights.         When even sunflower seeds and dumplings are labeled as "threats," the veteran scholar of China-U.S. relations emphasized, it exposes the absurdity and desperation behind Washington's containment strategy.     Turning to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) itself, he was even more incisive: "In the context of international law, the UFLPA has no legitimate legal foundation. In fact, it violates basic WTO rules and international trade norms."    He also added that the enforcement criteria of UFLPA are fatally flawed, adopting an unfair, rebuttable presumption that treats all related entities as guilty without evidence. When the law arbitrarily expands restrictions without clear, consistent judgment, it reverses the fundamental legal principle of presumption of innocence.     To suppress China, Washington has disregarded legal principles and fallen into logical contradictions, going to extraordinary lengths to achieve its ends.    Mahoney stressed: "It is blatant economic coercion, which could bring far-reaching harm," including erecting unnecessary trade barriers, hindering the flow of bilateral goods, and disrupting global industrial chain arrangements. Washington will hardly be able to bear the bitter fruits of these spillover effects.    Backtracking the very next day: Political calculation trumps economic and trade consensus     Just one day before the sanctions were announced, senior Chinese and U.S. officials in charge of economic and trade affairs had just held a video call, during which both sides stated that they were ready to jointly push for stable and sound China-U.S. economic and trade ties. Yet Washington brandished the big stick of sanctions almost immediately after those remarks. According to Mahoney, the timing is a deliberate and calculated provocation.     "The U.S. uses engagement and escalation as two sides of the same policy. It aims to create unilateral leverage before the follow-up consultations, break the mutual trust just built and force China into unnecessary concessions, completely violating the consensus reached by both parties."    The so-called "human rights concerns" appear to be a plausible pretext by the U.S. Yet in Mahoney's eyes, the sanction escalation stems almost entirely from domestic U.S. political calculation.     As the midterm elections draw near, demonstrating toughness on China remains one of the few tactics to unite Washington's bitterly-divided political establishment. The U.S. Congress has consistently demanded more aggressive UFLPA enforcement, and expanding the entity list helps insulate the White House from criticism by China Hawks.    Mahoney sees through this ploy: "It says nothing more than a convenient political fig leaf."    But just how much of Washington's shame can this fig leaf possibly cover?        Mahoney pointed directly to long-unresolved domestic issues in the United States, including sweatshop labor, prison labor and the abuse of migrant labor. Abroad, Washington has resorted to the aggression against Venezuela, against Iran, and supporting the genocide in Gaza.     Plagued by deep-seated domestic ills and a dismal human rights record, Washington, though, has long posed as a self-appointed "world's policeman," but its actions only serve to expose its deep hypocrisy.    Mahoney warned that, faced with election-driven pressures, continued festering of domestic governance problems in the U.S. could push Washington toward increasingly radical foreign policy stances. This sanction move, which represents a betrayal of previous consensus, has further eroded the already fragile China-U.S. mutual trust and introduced considerable uncertainties for subsequent high-level consultations.      Truth long obscured: Heavy barriers hide the reality     Western public discourse has long been awash with various false narratives targeting China, Xinjiang in particular.    "One of the interesting things we know about the cotton industry in Xinjiang is that there's no 'forced labor,' period. One of the things that is sort of interesting is that anyone can go to Xinjiang. It welcomes all visitors." Mahoney iterated in the interview.    During his recent visit to Xinjiang, Mahoney not only witnessed firsthand the highly-mechanized cotton-harvesting operations, but also toured local factories that produce harvesting equipment.    Inside the production workshops, he saw working teams led by female engineers, and members included Uyghurs who were there as professionals. Everyone performed their respective duties, actively contributing ideas and energy to production with great enthusiasm. Nowhere did he see "forced labor" or "slave labor" decried in Western media narratives.     Only by experiencing it firsthand and verifying through on-the-ground investigation can one get a glimpse of the truth. Mahoney noted that foreign visitors traveling to Urumqi, Karamay, and Kashgar are consistently struck by the region's stability, public order, and the well-being of its people.    Not everyone can afford, unfortunately, to travel to China, as Mahoney introduced, especially many Americans who find their position eroding economically because of the very policies that the current administration is putting into place. "They're kind of trapped in economic decline."    Some anti-China forces have long engaged in blame-shifting, seeking to externalize domestic governance conflicts and divert public discontent through media narratives. Trapped within pre-set information echo chambers, ordinary citizens lack the means to verify the truth by traveling to China. Exposed over time to one-sided, misleading and even false reports, they readily develop deep-seated negative stereotypes about China.    Encouragingly, the current media landscape is quietly shifting.    Mahoney noticed that a level of criticality has sort of entered the discussion now, which is creating an opening for people to take a more balanced look at China.    In recent years, China has rolled out multiple visa-exemption policies, and the popularity of travelling to China continues to surge. In his view, this offers an excellent opportunity for people overseas to break free from false narratives and see a multifaceted, authentic China. At the end of the interview, Mahoney shared his observations on the future development of China-U.S. relations.     In his view, how relations unfold between these two major powers has implications well beyond the two nations but also the global order.     Mahoney explained how Europe, faced with persistently high risks of deindustrialization, is further impacted by the energy crisis amid regional conflicts stoked by the United States, such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the Iran-Israel conflict. A large volume of opportunities and investment therefore has flowed outward, forcing Europe to adopt trade-protectionist stances toward China, which brings complications to China's relationship with the EU. Mahoney said that a growing number of countries are seeing these developments. And they realize that if they want to avoid the boot heel of American hegemony, they have to find more constructive alternatives and the ability to advance according to their own agendas. "And these, in fact, are the alternatives that China is offering them."    He held that some significant headwinds would be raised for the short-term development of China-U.S. relations and they would become more complicated.     His position is that the United States is facing a relative decline and is being hollowed out from within by itself while still being engaged in imperial overreach globally. Increasingly, the world is building alternatives to that type of U.S. dominated model.     On the contrary, China is probably the country best-positioned in the world to weather those types of risks and to even moderate them to some extent. He believes the country will work through this.    "China has been a responsible major power that has committed itself to stability over conflict," said Mahoney.    "If the U.S. can wake up to that realization, while at the same time figure out a way to change its behavior and commitment to structural inequalities, then I think we might find the two countries being able to move together in a way that would better result in a shared future for humanity," he concluded.                    。产业层面，光通信板块上周迎来多重催化：美国ITI正式反对FCC将光模块列入限制清单，外部恐慌情绪逐步消解；中际旭创半年报营收417.78亿元（同比+182.49%）、净利136.51亿元（同比+241.70%）；新易盛推出激进股权激励，营收目标跳升至千亿级，释放高增长强信心。

二 | 建议继续关注重仓AI算力、半导体设备、新能源电池等核心科技龙头的创业板50指数。　　创业板为成长型创新创业企业提供直接融资平台。权重行业方面，创业板50指数聚焦信息技术+新能源+金融科技+医药四大新质生产力赛道，科技成长属性纯粹。　　图：创业板50指数四大赛道　　数据来源：Wind，华安基金，截至2026-8-21　　创业板50指数：追“光”识“新”更掘“金”。横向对比来看，创业板50指数的光模块含量、新能源电池含量以及金融科技含量优于创业板指以及主流宽基指数。　　创业板50ETF华安（159949）：汇聚创业板优势领域白马，聚焦高科技成长属性的龙头企业，近六年ROE水平保持15%~19%高位，对比其他主流宽基指数优势突出，2025/2026Q1归母净利润增速高达21.58%/42.38%。

三 | 当前估值35.08倍，近十年30.62%分位（数据来源：Wind，截至2026-8-21）。　　创业板50指数（399673.SZ）权重行业观点：　　上周通信板块有三件大事值得关注。一是上周美国信息科技产业委员会（ITI）正式向美国联邦通信委员会（FCC）表达“反对FCC将光模块列入限制清单”，ITI特别强调，光模块对数据中心建设具有关键作用，一旦供应链受到扰动，将直接影响美国数据中心的部署进度乃至美国AI的整体竞争力。

四 | 当前光模块领域美国对中国的依赖远大于中国对相关管制的忌惮，FCC管制预期带来的恐慌情绪正逐步消解，有望推动光通信板块情绪修复。　　二是光模块龙头中际旭创交出亮眼半年报，上半年实现营业收入417.78亿元，同比增长182.49%；归母净利润136.51亿元，同比增长241.70%，拟每10股派发现金红利12元。

五 | 1.6T硅光模块进入规模放量阶段成为收入增长核心，且在手订单已覆盖2026全年并延伸至2027年，公司同步推进NPO/XPO/CPO/OCS等下一代光互连技术布局。　　三是新易盛抛出激进股权激励计划，拟向不超过961名激励对象授予限制性股票总量648.12万股，授予价格为212元/股，约为最新收盘价的50%。业绩考核目标从百亿级直接跳升至千亿级：2026—2028年营收目标分别不低于500亿元、累计不低于1400亿元、累计不低于2900亿元，释放出对未来三年高增长的强信心。　　建议长期持续关注光模块、光器件及CPO产业链，创业板50指数含“光”量达30%，远高于其余主流宽基指数。（以上个股仅作示例，不作为投资建议）　　上周新能源电池板块随大盘高位震荡。

六 | 碳酸锂价格企稳反弹——8月以来主力合约从约13.5万元/吨升至近15.9万元/吨、月内最高涨逾17%，本质是对明年过度悲观需求预期的集中修复，叠加锂盐厂集中检修、津巴布韦锂精矿到港不及预期与库存连续十余周去化的供给偏紧支撑。产业数据来看，8月头部电池企业排产环比大幅提升，行业开工率普遍超85%、头部企业满负荷生产并启动外协，Q2业绩延续向上、9-10月旺季临近。

七 | 锂电消费税落地扰动，自2026年9月1日起对锂离子电池按2%税率征收消费税（2027年9月升至4%，钠电/固态电池继续免征），亿纬锂能等已宣布9月起内销电池涨价约2%、多家产业链企业发布5%–30%调价公告，市场关注成本传导与顺价能力，机构普遍认为对行业整体盈利影响有限、反而利于落后产能出清与份额向龙头集中。此外，2026世界动力电池大会将于9月3–4日在四川宜宾举办，产业催化预期升温。（以上个股仅作示例，不作为投资建议）　　上周电子板块有所调整，但产业端催化密集。长江存储科创板IPO正式获上交所受理，计划募资330亿元，2026年一季度营收470.42亿元、归母净利润333.79亿元，全球NAND Flash厂商按出货量排名已升至全球第三、中国第一，有望带动上游设备、材料、封测等产业链协同受益。兆易创新半年报业绩爆发，上半年营收115.66亿元（同比+178.67%），归母净利润68.57亿元（同比+1091.50%），存储景气持续改善正加速向利润端传导。板块短期调整不改AI算力与国产化两条产业主线，存储芯片景气上行、先进制程突破与国产存储龙头资本化三重逻辑共振，电子板块中长期配置价值依然突出。（以上个股仅作示例，不作为投资建议）　　创业板50ETF华安（代码：159949）简介：　　创业板50ETF华安跟踪创业板50指数，指数选取创业板市场知名度较高、流动性和市值居前的50家企业，当前主要涵盖通信、电子、新能源电池、互联网金融、生物医药等五大优势科技赛道龙头，投资价值相对较高。　　创业板50ETF华安（代码：159949）流动性充足，过去一年日均成交额21.11亿元，排名深交所ETF前列。该指数基金最新规模248.32 亿元，是市场上跟踪创业板相关指数较大的基金之一。　　创业板50ETF华安（159949）上周表现：交易代码基金名称净值规模（亿元）上周日均成交额（亿元）159949华安创业板50ETF1.6766248.3217.98　　数据来源：Wind，华安基金，2026-8-17至2026-8-21　　风险提示：以上仅为标的指数当前成份股分布的客观介绍，不构成任何投资建议，不作为投资收益的保证。

八 | 指数公司后续可能对指数编制方案进行调整，指数成份股的构成和权重可能会动态变化，请关注部分指数成份股权重较大、集中度较高的风险。　　本基金属于股票型基金，属于较高风险、较高预期收益的基金品种，主要投资于标的指数成份股及备选成份股，其联接基金主要通过投资目标ETF紧密跟踪标的指数的表现。本基金预期收益与风险高于货币市场基金、债券型基金与混合型基金，具有与标的指数相似的风险收益特征。：基金管理公司不保证本基金一定盈利，也不保证最低收益。基金的过往业绩并不预示其未来表现，基金管理人管理的其他基金的业绩并不构成基金业绩表现的保证。基金产品收益存在波动风险，投资需谨慎，详情请认真阅读本基金的基金合同、招募说明书等基金法律文件。

九 | 责任编辑：杨红卜。

Current article:http://l3qqvn3.zhaoliebengkuaiwaigeqi.bond/azdq3s/00qd.html

Published on:05:17:25